Chem1 General Chemistry Virtual Textbook → chemical eqilibrium → writing equilibrium constants
How to write equilibrium constant expressions
On this page:
OK, you know that an equilibrium constant expression looks something like K = [products] / [reactants],,, but how do you translate this into a format that relates to the actual chemical system you are interested in? This is an essential prerequisite for dealing with equilibrium calculation problems, which are treated in some detail in the unit that follows this one.
Although we commonly write equilibrium quotients and equilibrium constants in terms of molar concentrations, any concentration-like term can be used, including mole fraction and molality. Sometimes the symbols
Kc , Kx , and Km are used to denote these forms of the equilibrium constant. Bear in mind that the numerical values of Ks and Qs expressed in these different ways will not generally be the same.
Most of the equilibria we deal with in this course occur in liquid solutions and gaseous mixtures. We can express Kc values in terms of moles per liter for both, but when dealing with gases it is often more convenient to use partial pressures. These two measures of concentration are of course directly proportional:
so for a reaction A(g) → B(g) we can write the equilibrium constant as
All of these forms of the equilibrium constant are only approximately correct, working best at low concentrations or pressures. The only equilibrium constant that is truly constant (except that it still varies with the temperature!) is expressed in terms of activities, which you can think of as effective concentrations that allow for interactions between molecules. In practice, this distinction only becomes important for equilibria involving gases at very high pressures (such as are often encountered in chemical engineering) and in ionic solutions more concentrated than about 0.001 M. We will not deal much with activities in this course.
For a reaction such as CO2(g) + OH(aq) → HCO3(aq) that involves both gaseous and dissolved components, a hybrid equilibrium constant is commonly used:
Clearly, it is essential to be sure of the units when you see an equilibrium constant represented simply by "K".
It is sometimes necessary to convert between equilibrium constants expressed in different units. The most common case involves pressure- and concentration equilibrium constants.
The ideal gas law relates the partial pressure of a gas to the number of moles and its volume:
PV = nRT
Concentrations are expressed in moles/unit volume n/V, so by rearranging the above equation we obtain the explicit relation of pressure to concentration:
P = (n/V)RT
Conversely, c = (n/V) = P/RT
... so a concentration [A] can be expressed as PA(RT).
For a reaction of the form 2 A = B + 3 C, we can write
Assuming that all of the components are gases, the difference
(moles of gas in products) – (moles of gas in reactants) = Δng
is given by
How can the concentration of a reactant or product not change when a reaction involving that substance takes place? There are two general cases to consider.
This happens all the time in acid-base chemistry. Thus for the hydrolysis of the cyanide ion
CN+ H2O → HCN + OH
in which no [H2O] term appears. The justification for this omission is that water is both the solvent and reactant, but only the tiny portion that acts as a reactant would ordinarly go in the equilibrium expression. The amount of water consumed in the reaction is so minute (because K is very small) that any change in the concentration of H2O from that of pure water (55.6 mol L1) will be negligible.
Similarly, for the "dissociation" of water H2O = H+ + OH– the equilibrium constant is expressed as the "ion product" Kw = [H+][OH–].
But... be careful about throwing away H2O whenever you see it. In the esterification reaction
CH3COOH + C2H5OH → CH3COOC2H5 + H2O
that we discussed in a previous section, a [H2O] term must be present in the equilibrium expression if the reaction is assumed to be between the two liquids acetic acid and ethanol. If, on the other hand, the reaction takes place between a dilute aqueous solution of the acid and the alcohol, then the [H2O] term would not be included.
This is most frequently seen in solubility equilibria, but there are many other reactions in which solids are directly involved:
CaF2(s) → Ca2+(aq) + 2F→(aq)
Fe3O4(s) + 4 H2(g) → 4 H2O(g) + 3Fe(s)
These are heterogeneous reactions (meaning reactions in which some components are in different phases), and the argument here is that concentration is only meaningful when applied to a substance within a single phase.
Thus the term [CaF2] would refer to the concentration of calcium fluoride within the solid CaF2", which is a constant depending on the molar mass of CaF2 and the density of that solid. The concentrations of the two ions will be independent of the quantity of solid CaF2 in contact with the water; in other words, the system can be in equilibrium as long as any CaF2 at all is present.
Throwing out the constant-concentration terms can lead to some rather sparse-looking equilibrium expressions. For example, the equilibrium expression for each of the processes shown in the following table consists solely of a single term involving the partial pressure of a gas:
|1) CaCO3(s) → CaO(s) + CO2(g)||Thermal decomposition of limestone, a first step in the manufacture of cement.|
2) Na2SO4·10 H2O(s)
Na2SO4(s) + 10 H2O(g)
Sodium sulfate decahydrate is a solid in which H2O molecules (waters of hydration") are incorporated into the crystal structure.)
|3) I2(s) → I2(g)||sublimation of solid iodine; this is the source of the purple vapor you can see above solid iodine in a closed container.|
|4) H2O(l) → H2O(g)||Vaporization of water. When the partial pressure of water vapor in the air is equal to K, the relative humidity is 100%.|
The last two processes 3 and 4 represent changes of state (phase changes) which can be treated exactly the same as chemical reactions.
In each of the heterogeneous processes shown in the table, the reactants and products can be in equilibrium (that is, permanently coexist) only when the partial pressure of the gaseous product has the value consistent with the indicated Kp. Bear in mind also that these Kp 's all increase with the temperature.
Problem Example 1
What are the values of Kp for the equilibrium between liquid water and its vapor at 25°C, 100°C, and 120°C? The vapor pressure of water at these three temperatures is 23.8 torr, 760 torr (1 atm), and 1489 torr, respectively.
Comment: These vapor pressures are the partial pressures of water vapor in equilibrium with the liquid, so they are identical with the Kp's when expressed in units of atmospheres.
|The partial pressure of H2O above the surface of liquid water in a closed container at 25°C will build up to this value. If the cover is removed so that this pressure cannot be maintained, the system will cease to be at equilibrium and the water will evaporate.|
This temperature corresponds, of course, to the boiling point of water. The normal boiling point of a liquid is the temperature at which the partial pressure of its vapor is 1 atm.
|The only way to heat water above its normal boiling point is to do so in a closed container that can withstand the increased vapor pressure. Thus a pressure cooker that operates at 120°C must be designed to withstand an internal pressure of at least 2 atm.|
Your ability to interpret the numerical value of a quantity in terms of what it means in a practical sense is an essential part of developing a working understanding of Chemistry. This is particularly the case for equilibrium constants, whose values span the entire range of the positive numbers.
Although there is no explicit rule, for most practical purposes you can say that equilibrium constants within the range of roughly 0.01 to 100 indicate that a chemically significant amount of all components of the reaction system will be present in an equilibrium mixture and that the reaction will be incomplete or reversible.
As an equilibrium constant approaches the limits of zero or infinity, the reaction can be increasingly characterized as a one-way process; we say it is complete or irreversible. The latter term must of course not be taken literally; the Le Châtelier principle still applies (especially insofar as temperature is concerned), but addition or removal of reactants or products will have less effect.
The examples in the following table are intended to show that numbers (values of K), no matter how dull they may look, do have practical consequences!
|N2(g) + O2(g) → 2 NO(g)||
5×1031 at 25°C,
0.0013 at 2100°C
|These two very different values of K illustrate very nicely why reducing combustion-chamber temperatures in automobile engines is environmentally friendly.|
|3 H2(g) + N2(g) → 2 NH3(g)||
7×105 at 25°C,
56 at 1300°C
|See the discussion of this reaction in the section on the Haber process.|
|H2(g) → 2 H(g)||
1036 at 25°C,
6×105 at 5000°
|Dissociation of any stable molecule into its atoms is endothermic. This means that all molecules will decompose at sufficiently high temperatures.|
|H2O(g) → H2(g) + ½ O2(g)||8×1041 at 25°C||You wont find water a very good source of oxygen gas at ordinary temperatures!|
2 H2O(l) + 2 C(s)
|Kc = 1013 at 25°C||This tells us that acetic acid has a great tendency to decompose to carbon, but nobody has ever found graphite (or diamonds!) forming in a bottle of vinegar. A good example of a super kinetically-hindered reaction!|
The equilibrium expression for the synthesis of ammonia
3 H2(g) + N2(g) → 2 NH3(g)
can be expressed as
so Kp and Qp for this process would appear to have units of atm1, and Kc and Qc would be expressed in mol2 L2. And yet these quantities are often represented as being dimensionless. Which is correct? The answer is that both forms are acceptable. There are some situations (which you will encounter later) in which Ks must be considered dimensionless, but in simply quoting the value of an equilibrium constant it is permissible to include the units, and this may even be useful in order to remove any doubt about the units of the individual terms in equilibrium expressions containing both pressure and concentration terms. In carrying out your own calculations, however, there is rarely any real need to show the units.
Strictly speaking, equilibrium expressions do not have units because the concentration or pressure terms that go into them are really ratios having the forms (n mol L1)/(1 mol L1) or (n atm)/(1 atm) in which the unit quantity in the denominator refers to the standard state of the substance; thus the units always cancel out. (But first-year students are not expected to know this!)
For substances that are liquids or solids, the standard state is just the concentration of the substance within the liquid or solid, so for something like CaF(s), the term going into the equilibrium expression is [CaF2]/[CaF2] which cancels to unity; this is the reason we dont need to include terms for solid or liquid phases in equilibrium expressions. The subject of standard states would take us beyond where we need to be at this point in the course, so we will simply say that the concept is made necessary by the fact that energy, which ultimately governs chemical change, is always relative to some arbitrarily defined zero value which, for chemical substances, is the standard state.
It is important to remember that an equilibrium quotient or constant is always tied to a specific chemical equation, and if we write the equation in reverse or multiply its coefficients by a common factor, the value of Q or K will change.
The rules are very simple:
Writing the equation in reverse will invert the equilibrium expression;
Multiplying the coefficients by a common factor will raise Q or K to the corresponding power.
Here are some of the possibilities for the reaction involving the equilibrium between gaseous water and its elements:
|2 H2 + O2→ 2 H2O||10 H2 + 5 O2 → 10 H2O||H2 + ½ O2 → H2O||H2O → H2 + ½ O2|
Many chemical changes can be regarded as the sum or difference of two or more other reactions. If we know the equilibrium constants of the individual processes, we can easily calculate that for the overall reaction according to this rule:
Given the following equilibrium constants:
CaCO3(s) → Ca2+(aq) + CO32(aq)
K1 = 106.3
HCO3(aq) → H+(aq) + CO32(aq)
K2 = 1010.3
Calculate the value of K for the reaction CaCO3(s) + H+(aq) → Ca2+(aq) + HCO3(aq)
Solution: The net reaction is the sum of reaction 1 and the reverse of reaction 2:
CaCO3(s) → Ca2+(aq) + CO32(aq)
K1 = 106.3
H+(aq) + CO32(aq) → HCO3(aq)
|K2 = 10(10.3)|
|CaCO3(s) + H+(aq) → Ca2+(aq) + HCO3(aq)||K = K1/K2 = 10(-8.4+10.3) = 10+1.9|
Comment: This net reaction describes the dissolution of limestone by acid; it is responsible for the eroding effect of acid rain on buildings and statues. This an example of a reaction that has practically no tendency to take place by itself (small K1) being "driven" by a second reaction having a large equilibrium constant (K2). From the standpoint of the LeChâtelier principle, the first reaction is "pulled to the right" by the removal of carbonate by hydrogen ion. Coupled reactions of this type are widely encountered in all areas of chemistry, and especially in biochemistry, in which a dozen or so reactions may be linked.
The synthesis of HBr from hydrogen and liquid bromine has an equilibrium constant Kp = 4.5¥1015 at 25°C. Given that the vapor pressure of liquid bromine is 0.28 atm, find Kp for the homogeneous gas-phase reaction at the same temperature.
Solution: The net reaction we seek is the sum of the heterogeneous synthesis of HBr and the reverse of the vaporization of liquid bromine:
|H2(g) + Br2(l) → 2 HBr(g)||Kp = 4.5×1015|
|Br2(g) → Br2(l)||Kp = (0.28)1|
|H2(g) + Br2(g) → 2 HBr(g)||Kp = 1.6×1019|
Heterogeneous reactions are those involving more than one phase. Some examples:
|Fe(s) + O2(g) → FeO2(s)||air-oxidation of metallic iron (formation of rust)|
|CaF2(s) → Ca(aq) + F+(aq)||dissolution of calcium fluoride in water|
|H2O(s) → H2O(g)||sublimation of ice (a phase change)|
|NaHCO3(s) + H+(aq) →
CO2(g) + Na+(aq) + H2O(g)
|formation of carbon dioxide gas from sodium bicarbonate when water is added to baking powder (the hydrogen ions come from tartaric acid, the other component of baking powder.)|
A particularly interesting type of heterogeneous reaction is one in which a solid is in equilibrium with a gas. The sublimation of ice illustrated in the above table is a very common example. The equilibrium constant for this process is simply the partial pressure of water vapor in equilibrium with the solid— the vapor pressure of the ice.
Many common inorganic salts form solids which incorporate water molecules into their crystal structures. These water molecules are usually held rather loosely and can escape as water vapor. Copper(II) sulfate, for example forms a pentahydrate in which four of the water molecules are coordinated to the Cu2+ ion while the fifth is hydrogen-bonded to SO42. This latter water is more tightly bound, so that the pentahydrate loses water in two stages on heating:
These dehydration steps are carried out at the temperatures indicated above, but at any temperature, some moisture can escape from a hydrate. For the complete dehydration of the pentahydrate we can define an equilibrium constant:
CuSO4·5H2O(s) → CuSO4(s) + 5 H2O(g) Kp = 1.14×1010
The vapor pressure of the hydrate (for this reaction) is the partial pressure of water vapor at which the two solids can coexist indefinitely; its value is Kp1/5 atm. If a hydrate is exposed to air in which the partial pressure of water vapor is less than its vapor pressure, the reaction will proceed to the right and the hydrate will lose moisture. Vapor pressures always increase with temperature, so any of these compounds can be dehydrated by heating.
Loss of water usually causes a breakdown in the structure of the crystal; this is commonly seen with sodium sulfate, whose vapor pressure is sufficiently large that it can exceed the partial pressure of water vapor in the air when the relative humidity is low. What one sees is that the well-formed crystals of the decahydrate undergo deterioration into a powdery form, a phenomenon known as efflorescence.
When a solid is able to take up moisture from the air, it is described as hygroscopic. A small number of anhydrous solids that have low vapor pressures not only take up atmospheric moisture on even the driest of days, but will become wet as water molecules are adsorbed onto their surfaces; this is most commonly observed with sodium hydroxide and calcium chloride. With these solids, the concentrated solution that results continues to draw in water from the air so that the entire crystal eventually dissolves into a puddle of its own making; solids exhibiting this behavior are said to be deliquescent.
|name||formula||vapor pressure, torr|
|sodium sulfate decahydrate||Na2SO4·10H2O||19.2||25.3|
|copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate||CuSO4·5H2O||7.8||12.5|
|calcium chloride monohydrate||CaCl2·H2O||3.1||5.1|
At what relative humidity will copper sulfate pentahydrate lose its waters of hydration when the air temperature is 30°C? What is Kp for this process at this temperature?
Solution: From the table above, we see that the vapor pressure of the hydrate is 12.5 torr, which corresponds to a relative humidity (you remember what this is, dont you?) of 12.5/31.6 = 0.40 or 40%. This is the humidity that will be maintained if the hydrate is placed in a closed container of dry air
For this hydrate, Kp = P(H2O)0.5, so the partial pressure of water vapor that will be in equilibrium with the hydrate and the dehydrated solid (remember that both solids must be present to have equilibrium!), expressed in atmospheres, will be (12.5/760)5 = 1.20E-9.
One of the first hydrates investigated in detail was calcium sulfate hemihydrate (CaSO4·½ H2O) which LeChâtelier (he of the “principle”) showed to be the hardened form of CaSO4 known as plaster of Paris. Anhydrous CaSO4 forms compact, powdery crystals, whereas the elongated crystals of the hemihydrate bind themselves into a cement-like mass that makes this material useful for making art objects, casts for immobilizing damaged limbs, and as a construction material (fireproofing, drywall.)
Make sure you thoroughly understand the following essential ideas which have been presented above. It is especially imortant that you know the precise meanings of all the highlighted terms in the context of this topic.